All Three Leading Independent Proxy Advisors Recommend UniFirst Shareholders Vote “FOR” Engine Capital’s New Director Candidates at 2026 Annual Meeting
ISS, Glass Lewis, and Egan-Jones Send Strong Message to Independent Directors
Engine Encourages
Engine Reiterates its Belief That COO
Engine encourages former UniFirst employees and other stakeholders to share feedback about their experiences with the Company at www.SaveUniFirst.com, where information can be shared confidentially and anonymously.
“All three leading independent proxy advisory firms have recommended shareholders vote against
This election contest centers on three fundamental questions:
- Should the Board initiate a strategic review and engage with credible buyers to maximize value for all shareholders?
-
Should
Mr. Sintros be made a scapegoat for issues that stem from long-standing governance and cultural failures caused byCynthia Croatti ? - Should UniFirst continue operating under a governance structure that has repeatedly failed to protect the interests of its common shareholders?
We hope shareholders will send a resounding message to the independent directors (
We want to thank the former UniFirst employees who have reached out to us recently and provided invaluable feedback and insights into the organization. Your perspectives reinforce the findings from our initial diligence: UniFirst is suffering from a culture that prioritizes internal politics over performance, lacks meaningful operational oversight, and marginalizes employees who dare to raise concerns. Loyalty is rewarded over capability, to the detriment of the business. Against this backdrop, we remain deeply concerned that
In its report, Glass Lewis made the following points regarding the need for boardroom change:1
- “We view the concentration of power in the Class B shares as a governance risk, as it can allow the controlling shareholders to override the will of the majority of shareholders on critical matters.”
- “[T]he controlling family’s reluctance to engage on a sizable premium offer suggests a possible misalignment of shareholder interests, for example prioritizing family control or legacy considerations.”
-
“The underperformance relative to Cintas and the broader market, with
Russell 2000 TSR since 2017 at approximately 90%, suggests that something has been lacking in UniFirst’s strategy or execution.”
- “Engine’s push to explore a sale appears driven by a reasonable assessment that a well-capitalized buyer could pay a significant premium, a notion validated by Cintas’ recent bid.”
In its report concluding that the election of Engine’s nominees is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders, Egan-Jones noted the following:2
- “[W]e conclude that UniFirst’s underperformance and operational shortcomings stem from an ineffective strategy from the existing leadership.”
- “While the Croatti family’s voting power enables them to control major corporate decisions including whether to pursue strategic alternatives, they have far less financial risk than other shareholders.”
- “This pattern of rejecting strategic alternatives without a sound standalone plan suggests poor governance and operational execution, further eroding shareholder trust and limiting the Company’s ability to maximize its potential for value creation.”
Voting Instructions
Only your latest-dated vote counts. Shareholders who have already voted for the incumbents on the Company’s white card or white voting instructions form may change their vote by voting a later-dated BLUE proxy card or BLUE voting instruction form. All of Engine’s materials are available at www.saveunifirst.com. Please call
About
| ____________________________ |
|
1 Permission to quote Glass Lewis was neither sought nor obtained. |
|
2 Permission to quote Egan-Jones was neither sought nor obtained. |
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251210815283/en/
For Investors:
jferguson@saratogaproxy.com
For Media:
gmarose@longacresquare.com / bkirpalani@longacresquare.com
Source: